Guest Speaker: Joshua Hwang
Reflections on our approach to studying
As I prepare for another season of rich exam studying, I (and many others) begin to wonder
why we study so much. What do we hope to gain through studying?
There are many perspectives that students often take:
- Many people study solely to achieve the highest grade possible. If content will not be tested upon, it will not be learned. In this way of thinking, the content itself is not where one's focus lies.
- Some people study to absorb the content. For whatever reason, be it interest or a predicted future value, the content of the lessons are the focus of one's study.
- Others may study to develop their ability to learn. The process of learning is what interests them more than the content itself. Here the focus lies in the skills required.
The order I have put them in does not reflect my view on how good or bad any of these perspectives are. I firmly believe that all of these vantage points bring something to the table. Focusing on grades can allow one to study very efficiently, cutting out irrelevant or overly time-consuming content. To have a genuine interest in a subject is wonderful and can make studying quick and enjoyable. Foresight in studying makes learning that much easier in the future. Lastly, cultivating the ability to learn is one of the greatest and most profitable gifts one can give to themselves or others.
Of course all of these perspectives are not mutually exclusive, you may hold one or all of these views at the same time. In fact, that is what I often do. However, is there something more, or even something else, to be gained through the process of studying?
Bear with me here, things are about to get a little "out there".
Is possible that the process of learning, in and of itself, is enough of a gain to all of us. Maybe the studying itself is intrinsically satisfying, and it alone brings a type of fulfillment.
This is a very zen way of a approaching studying. Zen is a school of Buddhism that focuses on experiencing the present moment. What is the sound of one hand clapping? What is an exam with no grade?
So I ask you just as much as I ask myself:
Are learners limited to these perspectives?
Are there other perspectives?
Are all of these perspectives on studying good? Are they even useful?
Is it possible to appreciate studying intrinsically?
Do you even believe in this "zen" thing?
While you contemplate that, I'll be studying biochemistry and simultaneously clapping one hand.

Hi Joshua, thankx for your participation :) I love the title of your post! Did you ever had a "zen moment of learning"?
Posted by: Steli Efti | March 31, 2007 at 10:59 PM
Thanks for having me, Steli!
Although I can't say I know exactly what zen is, I would like to think I have had several zen moments of learning.
A little while ago I was researching for a Philosophy of Medicine project, and I was in a very calm and productive mindset. I didn't seem to notice how much work I was doing until I stepped back.
And I know a lot of people don't like math, but I think it is very easy to get absorbed into the now when you are solving a challenging problem.
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:08 PM
I would expand by saying that every goal or vision requires "studying" both inner and outer world aspects. The exam is whether they are still going in the right direction. (mini quiz). And yes there is intrinsic studying. Anything that broadens your tolerance level by improving your ability to see different perspectives or simply to satisfy curiosity. :)
Posted by: Peter | March 31, 2007 at 11:10 PM
What about the "feelings" of learning. Learning used to feel like hard work to me as a pupil. Then - after reframing learning to me from something that causes pain to something that gives me freedom - I literally LOVE learning. I am a learning lunatic :) How do you FEEL about the feeling that most students have while learning?
Posted by: Steli Efti | March 31, 2007 at 11:16 PM
Zen of Studying...I have to remember this: ooohhhmmm.... :) cool info! Cheers
Posted by: anonymus | March 31, 2007 at 11:18 PM
About direction, sometimes I find that it is easy to get distracted from one's original goal (pure learning, for example) in the light of a world of external pressures (competition especially). It is a careful balance, as Peter noted, to keep both in mind.
Are their certain environments (internal or external) that help us remember our paths?
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:21 PM
Wow this is crazy, you type something, and then there's already another comment. But I digress...
I think the love of learning is the most natural state for all of us learners. (So Steli, I do not think you are a lunatic.) I really believe that deep inside everyone, even those who say they hate learning, that they yearn for the satisfaction that comes with new knowledge.
It's sort of funny because there are so many factors that can make one adore or abhor learning. The trick is finding your groove.
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:26 PM
Cool post to find out how and why I learn. I think I´m one of these guys: Others may study to develop their ability to learn. The process of learning is what interests them more than the content itself. Here the focus lies in the skills required.
Posted by: Halil | March 31, 2007 at 11:27 PM
You know what Halil, I think I'm one of those guys too.
The marks grab only came about because of utility and asian parenting. The pure interestingness of the content is not always there. But the process is always, hopefully, something to be cultivated.
I think finding zen in learning is just an extention of how to dive deeper into the process.
Finding the mind is the mind.... Ooh, trippy.
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Well said Joshua! Do you think there is a way for schools to show their students the GROOVE? I believe schools should become a little more groovy anywayz don´t cha? ;)
Posted by: Steli Efti | March 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM
I like your post Steli, now I'm thinking of that Pussycat Dolls song.
The trick, one of them at least, is differentiation (a more technical way of saying cater to the students needs). Frankly, I wouldn't know how to bring this about practically in a school setting (without a lot more money); however, there are a lot of people smarter than me posting today. In fact, Jon Bennett replied to this question when I posed it earlier today:
http://supercoolschool.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/mini_session_2_.html
That's some nice work.
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:40 PM
The use of blogs and wiki's where there is interaction. Teacher posts what to find out then steps out of the way until the end and recaps to the idea of the lesson would be 1 possibility
Posted by: Peter | March 31, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Ah Peter, sweet sweet self-directed learning. Right after I read your post, I knew you were the one that posted about it. I am sorry to say I was doing biochemistry at the time the discussion was flourishing.
I know this mode of learning works for older students, do you know if it works for younger ones as well? Or is it appropriate for them?
Posted by: Joshua Hwang | March 31, 2007 at 11:56 PM
If they can write I think it is applicable. Closer monitoring and individual discussions might be required but the idea is to make it fun. The topics should initially be about geography, cartoons, what's for lunch exchange program, what's the highest mountain that have people living on it....
Posted by: Peter | April 01, 2007 at 12:06 AM